Michael Sean Winters is right to detect in my post yesterday
a level of frustration with Bishop Lori and President Garvey that reaches
beyond the specifics of their handling of Bishop Bruskewitz’s impertinent
“question.” While Michael is right to point out that there is a certain
protocol to the USCCB gatherings, I want to make clear that my concern is with
the broader context of the bishops’ ongoing campaign for religious freedom more
generally and its upcoming “Fortnight of Freedom” specifically.
I was upset by the ignorance and incompetence displayed in
Lori and Garvey’s feeble-minded response to Bishop Bruskewitz because it is
part of a pattern of high profile steps indicative of some sort of combination
of public relations incompetence, shallow ignorance and latent bigotry that
lead me to conclude that the Fortnight of Freedom will be similarly marred by
those qualities unless the bishops and the lay leaders who have their ear come
to their senses. Examples of this pattern are numerous. Consider the Catholic
Governor Sam Brownback, one of the leading politicians in the conservative
Evangelical/Catholic alliance, signing into law just weeks ago so-called
“anti-Shariah” legislation with nary a peep of resistance from the Diocese of Kansas or key leaders of the USCCB. This came on the heels of the Auxiliary Bishop of Detroit
appearing at a religious freedom rally where he shared the microphone with the
President of the Thomas More Law Center, an organization known for its reckless
attacks on the religious liberty of Muslims. This disregard for the religious
freedom of Muslims is sadly consistent with the Bishops’ own failure to even
mention the numerous threats to Muslim’s religious liberty in their major
“Statement on Religious Liberty”. Lest anyone believe that these judgments are
the result of my own progressive bias, know that even a cursory look at the
recent actions of the conservative Becket Fund to distance themselves from
anti-Muslim laws and bigotry reveals that my outrage is rooted in a very basic
understanding of “religious freedom for all” that the bishops claim to
represent. Lori and Garvey’s stated ignorance of the gutter level charge of
Muslim “exemption” from the Affordable Care Act is therefore to me not
primarily a result of protocols surrounding USCCB gatherings but of a
consistent display of genuine ignorance of and disregard for the very real threats
to religious liberty facing Muslims.
Unfortunately the bishops’ failure to consistently apply
their concern for religious freedom to Muslims is not the only major weakness
that Lori and Garvey’s actions confirm. By showing such notable absence of even
the most basic public relations savvy they follow in a long line of gaffes
related to questions of religious freedom. Cardinal Dolan’s choice to compare the passage of a gay marriage bill by the state of New York to North Korea
comes to mind, as does Cardinal George’s unfortunate comparison of gay pride
marchers in Chicago to the KKK. The instinct to compare their perceived opponents
to fascists was also on display when the Bishop of Peoria, Illinois said
Obama’s HHS Mandate put him on a “similar path” to that taken by Bismarck, Clemenceau, Hitler and Stalin. In these and other cases the bishops have shown
themselves to be, as Saturday Night Live used to say, “not yet ready for prime
time players” when it comes to the task of communicating their commitment to
religious freedom in civil, competent ways.
I take no delight in pointing these errors out. I have ignored
them for weeks now in the hope that the bishops would use this Atlanta
gathering as a time to reign in their rhetoric, put forward their competence
and put these past incidents in the past--maybe even just let the excellent lawyers bringing suit agains the HHS Mandate do their work. I was perhaps naïve to expect a clear
display of perspective and poise by the leaders of the upcoming Fortnight of
Freedom. Instead, I saw, in addition to the Bruskewitz incident, Garvey and
Lori holding up the example of Thomas More with such simplicity and naivete
that Cardinal George took it upon himself, immediately after Bishop
Bruskewitz’s question, to engage in a sort of mini-history lesson for Garvey
and Lori on the basic fact that THOMAS MORE BEHEADED COUNTLESS PEOPLE FOR THEIR
RELIGIOUS VIEWS. The sense that Lori and Garvey are leading “the gang that
can’t shoot straight” was not relieved in the session that followed a recess. The
very first speaker, the excellent Bishop Pates, noted that there was
significant comment and some media questions during the break about Bishop
Burkewitz’s question and that it had been decided that he should immediately
make a statement to the gathering. The core of Pates’ comments was this: “Our
very capable staff here at the Conference very quickly researched the question
that Bishop Bruskewitz raised with regard to the Muslims and they asked me to
say that they are not exempt.” While I commend Bishop Pates for his
intervention, I can’t help but note how easy it was for the “capable staff” to
ascertain the truth of the matter. If a few minutes over lunch break were
enough time to answer Bruskewitz’s query with competence, what does it say for
the general competence of Lori and Garvey that they could not come up with the
answer in real time?
I should mention that I worked in the 1990s for a religious
publisher, InterVarsity Press, in a public relations capacity and I have been
an avid follower of religious and general media for decades. Since moving to
Washington DC in October of 2010 I have been particularly active in writing
about the intersection of religious leaders and public policy in the media
spotlight. I have paid specific attention to the relationship between the
Bishops and the leadership of the Obama administration, especially the
leadership of the Health and Human Services (HHS). As I have said in the past,
part of my interest in this relationship is personal—my wife is one of the
thousands of employees of HHS and we are raising our children in the Catholic
faith. I also am one of the vanishing breed of pro-life Democrats who watched
in horror in 2010 as the hierarchy of the USCCB aided and abetted the
demonization of “Obamacare” and helped provide the rhetorical firepower for a
campaign by pro-life groups to rid the House of Representatives of pro-life
Democrats who voted for the Affordable Care Act. The viciousness of this
campaign—from the attack on Notre Dame for inviting President Obama to speak,
to the takedown of Congressman Stupak for carving out wording on abortion that
allowed him to vote for the ACA—was to me stunning and a direct reflection on
the leadership of the USCCB in the age of Obama. Despite these reservations
about and disagreements with the USCCB, I was very vocal at this blog and elsewhere in supporting the
bishops in their initial resistance to the HHS Mandate. Like many other
politically progressive Catholics, I could see in the Mandate an Executive
Branch overreach with profound constitutional repercussions and potentially
devastating effects on religion in public life generally, and Catholic
involvement specifically.
I continue to believe,
even after the Obama administration’s accommodations, that lawsuits such as
those filed by Notre Dame in opposition to the Mandate are appropriate and
warranted. But I am done pretending that the leadership of this campaign
for religious freedom knows what they are doing, understands the issues at
sufficient depth, and is capable of communicating the breadth and depth of
Catholic social teaching in a way that will advance the overall common good
during the upcoming Fortnight of Freedom. What I expect to see is more
folly and I will be pleased if I am proven wrong. Bishop Pates and the
countless other outstanding bishops deserve better than the spectacle that is
likely to play out in the coming weeks. The Catholic Church is filled with
outstanding voices for religious liberty and it is telling that many of them are publicly distancing themselves from the USCCB’s efforts. This is a
long-winded response to Michael Sean Winters’ post, but I felt like he and you
the reader deserved a richer explanation for the tone and content of
yesterday’s post. Thanks for sticking with it to the end!! Peace. God is good!
No comments:
Post a Comment