MEMO FROM BEYOND THE
GRAVE
TO: Cardinal Dolan and Eric Metaxas
FROM: Frederick Douglass
SUBJECT: Religious Freedom in America
Gentlemen, it has come to my attention that in these United
States of America something of a controversy has arisen around the First
Amendment freedom of religion clause. I have heard your cries of injustice I
must say that I agree with your concerns with regard to the HHS Mandate. It
does seem that the current law would restrict religious freedom by narrowing
the definition of religious organizations in an overly narrow way. However, I
must say that I find your protestations about this injustice extraordinarily out
or proportion to the history of religious freedom in this country. I saw on
this newfangled thing called “twitter” that on June 16 Mr. Metaxas said he believes this mandate
is an “unprecedented abridgment of religious freedom itself"and I know that
Cardinal Dolan and many of his fellow Bishops have likewise portrayed this
Mandate and its narrow definition of religious organizations in a similarly
apocalyptic manner. It does make me wonder about the state of education in
America and whether my grave fears about the loss of memory concerning African
Americans in this land have come true. So allow me for just a moment to remind you
of the state of religious freedom in this land back in my times on this earth.
You would do well to recall that the HHS Mandate you so
rightly denounce has already made specific provisions for houses of worship and
other specifically religious institutions to gain exemption. In fact, it would
seem that your main gripe is that this exemption is too narrow. If that is your
main concern, then how in God’s good Name can you compare this situation with
the gravity of the situation that African American Churches faced in your land?
Surely you know that we were not even given the control over our own churches
and allowed to choose for ourselves our own religious traditions? Surely you
are aware of a wave of legislation that followed Nat Turner’s Slave Rebellion?
Here is how one of your current day scholars describes what my people faced in
terms of restrictions on relgious freedom. Do you really think that what the
HHS Mandate proposes is worse than this?
So, instead of abolishing slavery, Virginia decided
to revise and severely strengthen its already existing slave codes so that the
potential for another slave uprising would be almost impossible. Virginia’s new
codes made patrols and militia stronger, eliminated
slave schools, slave religious meetings, and slave preachers.8
The idea of abolition did not appeal to the other
southern states, so they, like Virginia, passed new restrictive slave laws and
codes in hopes of preventing another slave rebellion. States like Georgia and
South Carolina heavily relied on slavery for their economic success and thus it
was a crucial element to their well being, they could not just get rid of it…Southerners
attempted to keep blacks enslaved and suppressed by making their already
existing slave codes much harsher and by enacting new laws.10
After Turner’s rebellion, the actions and movements
of slaves were severely monitored…Religious
meetings or gatherings of slaves were also closely monitored. All blacks were
forbidden to preach or hold religious meetings. In fact, in Georgia, a law was
passed that forbade blacks to congregate and preach. The Act of December 23,
1833, Sec. 5, 1833 Ga. Laws 226, stated that “no person of color, whether free
or slave, shall be allowed to preach to, exhort or join in any religious
exercise, with any persons of color, either free or slave.” And if a slave or a
free black was found preaching, he or she was “sentenced to be whipped and
imprisoned at the discretion of the court: provided, such imprisonment shall
not exceed six months, and no whipping shall exceed thirty-nine lashes.”12 If a black person wanted to attend a religious meeting, he
or she could only do so at night with his or her master. They could also only
receive religious instruction from their master as well.
“At the time of the old Prophet
Nat, the colored folks was afraid to pray loud, for the whites threatened to
punish ‘em dreadfully if the least noise was heard...if they heard any of the
colored folks praying or singing a hymn, they would fall upon ‘em and abuse ‘em
and sometimes kill ‘em. The brightest and best was killed in Nat’s time”.–Lydia
Maria Child, a slave during Nat Turner’s rebellion.13
Laws such as this were enforced because whites
feared that if blacks were given an opportunity to congregate and preach
together, as they had with Nat Turner, then another insurrection could possibly
occur. Many southern whites believed that the black preachers were filling the
minds of slaves with notions of freedom and equality. They believed that the
black preachers were teaching slaves that blacks should have just as much
rights as whites and that “the black man was as good as the white man...and
that all men were born free and equal.” The preachers were also accused of
preaching that “white people had rebelled against England to gain their freedom
and so had the blacks a right to do so”. The black preachers were also accused
of circulating abolitionists pamphlets, some of which had been written by the
great abolitionist, William Lloyd Garrison. A portion of the black population
was able to read these pamphlets because they had been taught how to read by
their masters and because they had attended school. Thus, several states,
including Virginia, North Carolina, and Alabama, passed laws that forbade
slaves and free blacks form learning how to read and write.14
No comments:
Post a Comment