Of all the controversies about Obama, about the Affordable
Care Act (ACA), about how Catholics and other Christians should think about
this administration---none is bigger to me than the charge repeatedly made for
years now that the ACA, or “Obamacare” is somehow a Trojan horse for massive
increases in abortion funding in America. I have to say that this has always
been a particularly troubling charge for me not only because I consider myself
an Obama supporter opposed to abortion but also because my wife and I moved
across country so that she could take a position in the federal government
helping to implement the ACA. As people of Christian conscience, it is very
troubling that so many of my fellow Christians believe the worst possible thing
about the ACA, and by extension my wife’s work in implementing it—namely, that
it was conceived in large part in order to drastically increase abortions in
America. This charge, which played such a prominent role in the 2010 midterm
elections and led numerous pro-life Democrats being defeated, is again being
pushed as we head into the 2012 presidential election. I am therefore very
pleased to see this new piece by Timothy Stoltzfus Jost at Commonweal’s website
addressing this question with the most up-to-the-date research and facts. From
now on, this will be THE article I refer friends to when they accuse me of
being complicit in the murder of unborn children by my support for ACA (yes,
that happens). This article is unlikely to stop the drumbeat in much of the
pro-life community against the ACA, but it is an excellent contribution to the
literature arguing that far from being a pro-life loss, the ACA is
the single most prolife piece of legislation ever adopted
by Congress. Once the legislation is fully implemented, it will extend
insurance coverage for life-saving medical care to millions of Americans,
thousands of whom die each year because they lack access to care. The law
explicitly does not allow insurers to “make coverage decisions, determine
reimbursement rates, establish incentive programs, or design benefits in ways
that discriminate against individuals because of their age, disability, or
expected length of life.” All insurers in the individual and small-group market
will be required to cover maternity care, a benefit often missing from today’s
individual policies. None will be required to cover elective abortions.
(emphasis added)
No comments:
Post a Comment