When I studied under Andrew
Bacevich 15 years ago his was a voice in the wilderness. Now, sadly he would
say given all of the suffering that has happened in the years since, his voice
is the most credible representative of the vast majority of the American
people. Where the clear majority of the people in this country country is now—disgusted
by failed interventions, tired of continued fear-mongering and ready to reject
an imperial president’s wishes—is where Bacevich has been for two decades. His
interview with Phil Dononhue for the PBS show Moyers & Company is the clearest, most historically grounded
and morally insightful expression I have heard in this debate. Be sure to see
it. This is a moment when perhaps the American people will begin to dig deeper into how we have arrived at this moment. Here is a summary of his appearance:
With the probability of
American intervention, Syria is everywhere in the news. Phil Donahue,
filling in for Bill Moyers, speaks with historian and Vietnam veteran Andrew
Bacevich about America’s role in the world and the possible repercussions
of our actions in the Middle East. Given what we know about what’s going
on in Syria, is a U.S. response justified? And if we take action, where and
when does it stop? Is a military response justified and if we take action,
where does it stop?
“If you think back to 1980,” Bacevich tells Donahue, “and just
sort of tick off the number of military enterprises that we have been engaged
in that part of the world, large and small, you know, Beirut, Afghanistan, Iraq,
Yemen, Somalia — and on and on, and ask yourself, ‘What have we got done? What
have we achieved? Is the region becoming more stable? Is it becoming more
Democratic? Are we enhancing America’s standing in the eyes of the people
of the Islamic world?’ ‘The answers are, ‘No, no, and no.’ So why, Mr.
President, do you think that initiating yet another war in this protracted
enterprise is going to produce a different outcome?”
No comments:
Post a Comment