A president of the United States had fierce disagreements with a conservative Israeli leader due to potential actions by Israel against a Middle East foe. Does this sound like a description of Obama and Netanyahu over Iran? Try Ronald Reagan relating to Menachem Begin over Lebanon. How serious were their disagreements? At the time Reagan wrote in his personal diary that he had told Begin that Israel “had to stop [bombing Beirut, Lebanon] or our entire future relationship was endangered”.
We are heading into tense times in the relationship between Israel and the United States, but we have been through tough moments before. While many on the Right trumpet a narrative in which President Obama would appear to be the first president to ever have had significant disagreements and frustrations with Israel, it is worth remembering the 1982 tensions between Reagan and Begin over Lebanon if for no other reason than to remind ourselves that disagreeing with an Israeli leader over their military actions is not a sign of betrayal or weakness. Here is an excerpt from a story about Reagan's time in office:
Israel’s involvement in the Lebanese civil war began in June 1982, when it invaded its northern neighbor. Its goal was to root out the Palestine Liberation Organization, which had set up a state within a state, and to transform Lebanon into a Christian-ruled ally. The Israel Defense Forces soon besieged P.L.O.-controlled areas in the western part of Beirut. Intense Israeli bombardments led to heavy civilian casualties and tested even President Ronald Reagan, who initially backed Israel. In mid-August, as America was negotiating the P.L.O.’s withdrawal from Lebanon, Reagan told Prime Minister Menachem Begin that the bombings “had to stop or our entire future relationship was endangered,” Reagan wrote in his diaries.
Talking about the global common good and religion's role in promoting it here and around the world.
Popular Posts
-
My own life would be a lot simpler right now if I could come to a clear conclusion about Heidi Baker--either she is a Pentecostal Mother T...
-
The front page of the Washington Post announced the news: “Kerry: Saudis Support a Strike”, which elicited an instinctual ...
-
The book I had the opportunity to serve as research assistant for. When I studied under Andrew Bacevich 15 years ago his wa...
-
News of Russia’s proposal to help eliminate Syria’s chemical weapons naturally brings out American suspicions about how gen...
-
I am no fan of Vladimir Putin and I have real questions about what is motivating his recent actions, but I have to say that these words from...
-
The staggering numbers surrounding AIDS in Africa can leave us numb and paralyzed to act, but a new program under development by my good fr...
-
Maureen Dowd can be rude and crude, but she can also be right on target as she is in her latest column. She concludes with this: "Back ...
-
"We have perfected our weapons, our conscience has fallen asleep, and we have sharpened our ideas to justify ourselves. As if...
-
I have blogged this morning at a different site about my love for Les Miserables the musical, and my growing appreciation for Les Mis...
-
This is not meant as my final word on this, or even a clearly polished tentative word, but I do want to respond to my conscience and voic...
Friday, September 21, 2012
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment